home  |  about  | web management  | email: thelab@busreslab.com
 
Research Services
Online Surveys
Employee Surveys
   - Employee Satisfaction
   - Sarbanes-Oxley
   - Ethics
   - Productivity
   - Diversity
   - Culture
   - Health and Safety
   - Internal Customers
Customer Satisfaction
Other Surveys
Small Bus. Solutions
ESAT Budget Option
 
Consultants' Corner
Consultants Wanted
 
Free Online Information
Research Tips
Employee Satisfaction Surveys:
   14 Key Steps Described
Download Samples
Conferences
HR Tools
HR Survey Results
Good Policies
Bad Policies
Good Bosses
Bad Bosses
Success Profiles
Employee Survey Tips
 
Make Money
Online Survey Panel
Medical Survey Panel
Employee Panel
 
About The Lab
About Us
Contacting Us
Feedback
Sign Our Guest Book
 
Visa, MasterCard and American Express accepted
 

Bad Policies Links
Micromanagement
Toleration of Workplace Bullies
Error Reduction Policies Based on Frustration
Résumé Snooping
Favoritism
Sick Sick-day Rules
Unequal Treatment of New Employees
Not Being Forthright

Not Being Forthright

One of the items we measure in the employee satisfaction surveys we conduct is the level of trust employees have in what management tells them. This almost always turns out to be a very important factor when we calculate the relative importance of the attributes included in the survey.

Management has to build trust through its actions. At a minimum, management should not lie to employees if trust is to be built and maintained. But not lying, in and of itself, may not be enough to develop a trusting relationship, particularly when a company is at a key crossroad.

In addition to not lying, management must share important information with employees as soon as possible. For example, if layoffs are being considered, this information should be shared with employees as early in the "thinking process" as possible, even if the exact magnitude of the layoffs has not been determined. Major actions such as layoffs rarely escape the rumor mill, and the rumor mill has a knack of generating stories more horrific than any action actually being contemplated.

If the press picks up an important intended action, such as layoffs, before employees are told about it, severe damage can be done to employees' trust in management. This damage can be heightened if management initially denies the truth of the reported action and later admits that it will occur. It would have been better for management, in such a circumstance, to say "no comment."

Certainly, contractual/legal obligations will preclude management from telling the world everything about its intentions. But there comes a point where letting employees know of an intended action will not cause contractual problems. When this point is reached, employees should be the first to be told what is happening. If the only thing stopping management from confiding in employees about an intended action is the fear that some employees may resign, the situation has reached a point where forthrightness on the part of management will yield more benefits than problems.

If you know of an employee relations policy that you believe to be "bad," please e-mail us at thelab@busreslab.com for publication on this site. Let us know whether to include your name or company, or a link to your company's site. We'll assume you want to remain anonymous unless you tell us otherwise. Please include the words "bad policy" on the subject line.

To keep abreast of new information on our site and special offers, please sign our guest book.

Interested in learning more about The Business Research Lab's Employee Satisfaction Survey Packages? Check out our Gold and Silver Survey Packages.


  home  |  about  | web management  | email: thelab@busreslab.com
© Copyright 2007, The Business Research Lab
http://www.busreslab.com
thelab@busreslab.com
1-866-960-9824
1-713-467-6619